China’s Post-COVID Economic Landscape

A blue gloved hand holding a syringe and small bottle of Covid 19 vaccine

According to experts, China’s economic recovery following the end of what the World Health Organization called the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has been marred by significant challenges and struggles. Despite an initial rebound, the nation’s economy is grappling with weak growth and a lackluster job market, as evidenced by a significant number of unemployed urban workers. China, the world’s second-largest economy, experienced an initial rebound after the initial shock of the pandemic. Experts believe the strict containment measures and robust stimulus packages implemented by the Chinese government helped revive economic activity. However, the pace of recovery has since slowed and growth has been weaker than anticipated.

Because China heavily relies on global trade, ongoing disruption in international supply chains and reduced global demand have hampered its export-oriented industries. In addition, trade tensions with the US and other countries have also added to the challenges. Also, China has been grappling with long-standing structural issues in its economy, such as overcapacity in industries such as manufacturing and real estate. These issues have been further exacerbated by the pandemic, including the abrupt lifting at the end of 2022 of China’s “zero COVID” policies, which resulted in a massive surge of hospitalizations and deaths−a development that is further prolonging the process of recovery.

Experts believe that one of the most pressing issues in China’s economic recovery from the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic is the high rate of unemployment, particularly among urban workers. The pandemic forced many businesses to shut down or scale back operations, leading to a significant loss of jobs. Despite efforts to stimulate job creation, the labor market still remains sluggish. Observers also point out that China faces an imbalance between urban and rural areas in terms of job opportunities. Urban workers, who largely depend on manufacturing and services, have been hit hardest by the economic downturn. Rural areas, which rely primarily on agriculture, have been relatively less affected. Here is an opinion piece we found of interest relating to China’s current economic state as it continues to move through the COVID-19 pandemic.

I Went to China for the First Time in 3 Years, and I Saw Just How Formidable It Is

In an opinion piece for The New York Times, “I Went to China for the First Time in 3 Years, and I Saw Just How Formidable It Is,” Steven Rattner, chairman and CEO of Willett Advisors LLC (the investment arm for former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s personal and philanthropic assets), discusses the state of China’s economy in the aftermath of the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. He emphasizes that China’s economy has shown signs of recovery and expansion since the initial harms of the pandemic, with strong GDP growth and increased consumer spending. However, Rattner highlights several underlying issues that raise doubts about the sustainability and quality of this growth. One major concern is the country’s heavy reliance on debt-fueled investments, which has resulted in a significant buildup of corporate and government debt. This debt burden poses risks to financial stability and may hinder future economic progress.

A declining birth rate relative to China’s aging population has resulted in a shrinking workforce and a rising dependency ratio. Rattner points out both pose challenges to sustaining productivity and economic vitality in the long term. In addition, China has struggled to shift from an export-driven economy to one driven by domestic consumption. Yet despite government efforts to boost domestic consumption, many Chinese citizens remain cautious with their spending due to uncertainties surrounding the economy and future job prospects.

In addition, Rattner points out that the trade restrictions enforced by Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden have resulted in a decline in Chinese exports to the US. Various items, including furniture and consumer electronics, which are subject to a 25% US tariff, have experienced a trade reduction of more than 20% since 2017. Furthermore, Rattner adds that limitations on selling sensitive advanced technology to China are also having a detrimental effect. China’s own economic experts recognize that the ban on acquiring the most cutting-edge semiconductors will hinder their country’s progress in becoming a leader in artificial intelligence. Read the full article on The New York Times website.

Disclosure: Fatty Fish is a research and advisory firm that engages or has engaged in research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, including those mentioned in this article. The author does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned in this article.

The Fatty Fish Editorial Team includes a diverse group of industry analysts, researchers, and advisors who spend most of their days diving into the most important topics impacting the future of the technology sector. Our team focuses on the potential impact of tech-related IP policy, legislation, regulation, and litigation, along with critical global and geostrategic trends — and delivers content that makes it easier for journalists, lobbyists, and policy makers to understand these issues.