Experts emphasize the importance of mid-band spectrum in enabling the full potential of 5G networks. While low-band spectrum provides broad coverage and high-band spectrum offers high speeds, mid-band spectrum strikes a balance between coverage and capacity. The mid-band spectrum, specifically frequencies between 1 GHz and 6 GHz, possesses desirable characteristics for 5G deployment. It offers wider channels and greater capacity compared to low-band spectrum, allowing for faster data transfer rates and improved network performance. Mid-band spectrum also exhibits better propagation characteristics than high-band spectrum, meaning it can penetrate buildings and obstacles more effectively.
The experts point out that mid-band spectrum is particularly crucial for achieving reliable coverage in urban areas where high-band spectrum struggles due to its limited range. Deploying 5G networks in mid-band frequencies enables operators to deliver higher data rates and more consistent connectivity, satisfying the demands of both consumers and businesses. They emphasize the need for regulatory bodies and governments to allocate sufficient mid-band spectrum to mobile network operators. In addition, they suggest that a balanced spectrum portfolio, including a significant amount of mid-band frequencies, is essential to unlock the full potential of 5G technology and provide optimal services to users.
Chris Pearson, President of 5G Americas said, “For 5G deployments, it is important that low, mid and high band spectrum are utilized to provide the optimal experience for users. Mid-band spectrum plays a key role in providing both capacity and coverage that can translate to increased speed for applications and use cases.” He further said, “A long term national spectrum plan in the US will be paramount for economic and technology leadership.” Here is an opinion piece we found of interest relating to the importance in spectrum allocation for 5G deployment to compete with China.
Spectrum Allocation for a Contest with China
In an opinion piece “Spectrum Allocation for a Contest with China” for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, James Andrew Lewis, Senior Vice President; Pritzker Chair; and Director, Strategic Technologies Program, argues that the bedrock of national security lies in the economic strength, which today requires maintaining a leading position in technology. Sustaining technological advancement is essential for a robust economy and safeguarding the nation. While various emerging technologies hold significance for the future economy, such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, cloud computing, Open Radio Access Networks (ORAN), and biotechnology, their success heavily relies on the process of digitalization, commencing with 5G wireless networks.
According to Lewis, what is required is a reconsideration of how spectrum uses should be valued in the modern strategic landscape characterized by technological and economic competition. The evaluation of value should encompass opportunity costs, foregone commercial advantages, and the national security risks associated with not reallocating. When conducting this evaluation, he believes that decision-making should be driven by strategies that enable the United States to maintain its leadership in the current era. Lewis states that the current allocation of spectrum in the United States is designed for the previous century, and necessitates a change. Although the process of transition may be challenging and intricate, he says it is crucial for the United States to avoid lagging behind China in assigning mid-band spectrum for the new applications that 5G will offer. Consequently, the United States must identify methods to allocate sufficient amounts of licensed spectrum for 5G, while concurrently supporting other national security priorities to prevent falling behind. Read the full article on Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The Fatty Fish Editorial Team includes a diverse group of industry analysts, researchers, and advisors who spend most of their days diving into the most important topics impacting the future of the technology sector. Our team focuses on the potential impact of tech-related IP policy, legislation, regulation, and litigation, along with critical global and geostrategic trends — and delivers content that makes it easier for journalists, lobbyists, and policy makers to understand these issues.
- The Fatty Fish Editorial Teamhttps://fattyfish.org/author/fattyfish_editorial/
- The Fatty Fish Editorial Teamhttps://fattyfish.org/author/fattyfish_editorial/
- The Fatty Fish Editorial Teamhttps://fattyfish.org/author/fattyfish_editorial/
- The Fatty Fish Editorial Teamhttps://fattyfish.org/author/fattyfish_editorial/
